The way I see it, that’s 150 million chances lost to improve the quality of the Internet. JSTOR, as the keeper of so much great scholarly work, should be one of the Internet’s dominant suppliers of facts and serious research. But if something is not publicly available, key gatekeepers like journalists and Wikipedians, move to the best available source, even if they know that there probably is a better source behind JSTOR’s paywall. So, instead, JSTOR’s vast troves of valuable information remain within academia and the broader Internet’s immune system is that much weaker.
-
wild-lettuce reblogged this from abbyjean
-
salvia--divinorum reblogged this from abbyjean
-
buy--poppers reblogged this from abbyjean
-
magic--mushrooms reblogged this from abbyjean
-
wild-dagga reblogged this from abbyjean
-
searchwebm reblogged this from abbyjean
-
cremebruelle reblogged this from emilykarrot and added:
The other thing is that a lot of these articles are from periodicals and other journals that require a subscription,...
-
emilykarrot reblogged this from rememo and added:
I’m dreading the day I lose my rights to use JSTOR. The fact is though, servers cost money. JSTOR doesn’t have ads on...
-
bynzlarnes liked this
-
lalibertarienne reblogged this from derosnec and added:
What I find worst with JSTOR, is the fact they block content to students by charing an exorbitant price. Not all school...
-
derosnec reblogged this from sociopoliticaldribble
-
rememo reblogged this from aerialcircus
-
dancull reblogged this from elitc
-
invisiblebee liked this
-
elitc reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
Destroy the publishing-industrial-complex!
-
notquitebacon liked this
-
oldtobegin liked this
-
superfluidity liked this
-
aerialcircus reblogged this from abbyjean
-
fistsoffolly liked this
-
exhibitnumber1 reblogged this from abbyjean
-
se-smith liked this
-
m1kevee liked this
-
sociopoliticaldribble reblogged this from abbyjean
-
someoneloved liked this
-
decanted reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
Here is a university library’s effort to make as many of those peer-reviewed writings free to the public. I really like...
-
slightly liked this
-
fireflyinthesky liked this
-
chapel-eyes-odd reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
Of course, it isn’t really up to JSTOR since they pay journals for the rights to distribute content owned by those...
-
woh-battameez liked this
-
thesociologist liked this
-
kalemason reblogged this from abbyjean
-
sexartandpolitics liked this
-
bedbugsbiting liked this
-
abbyjean posted this
